Current:Home > InvestKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -MoneyBase
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
Chainkeen View
Date:2025-04-08 07:31:56
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (57)
Related
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- World Meteorological Organization Sharpens Warnings About Both Too Much and Too Little Water
- Ariana Grande Kicks Off 30th Birthday Celebrations Early With This Wickedly Festive POV
- Super Bowl commercials, from Adam Driver(s) to M&M candies; the hits and the misses
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Woman charged with selling fentanyl-laced pills to Robert De Niro's grandson
- California woman released by captors nearly 8 months after being kidnapped in Mexico
- 'New York Times' stories on trans youth slammed by writers — including some of its own
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- With layoffs, NPR becomes latest media outlet to cut jobs
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Warming Trends: A Delay in Autumn Leaves, More Bad News for Corals and the Vicious Cycle of War and Eco-Destruction
- And Just Like That's David Eigenberg Reveals Most Surprising Supporter of Justice for Steve
- Pennsylvania inmate captured over a week after making his escape
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Gabby Douglas, 3-time Olympic gold medalist, announces gymnastics comeback: Let's do this
- Off the air, Fox News stars blasted the election fraud claims they peddled
- Amazon will send workers back to the office under a hybrid work model
Recommendation
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
Looking to Reduce Emissions, Apparel Makers Turn to Their Factories in the Developing World
Maluma Is Officially a Silver Fox With New Salt and Pepper Hairstyle
She left her 2007 iPhone in its box for over a decade. It just sold for $63K
Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
Driven by Industry, More States Are Passing Tough Laws Aimed at Pipeline Protesters
Do work requirements help SNAP people out of government aid?
HarperCollins and striking union reach tentative agreement