Current:Home > InvestJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -MoneyBase
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-14 18:02:20
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (66)
Related
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Affordable Care Act provisions codified under Michigan law by Gov. Whitmer as a hedge against repeal
- Can the new film ‘Uncharitable’ change people’s minds about “overhead” at nonprofits?
- Former Stanford goalie Katie Meyer may have left clues to final hours on laptop
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- More fraud, higher bond yields, and faster airline boarding
- The Supreme Court keeps a Missouri law on hold that bars police from enforcing federal gun laws
- The US is welcomed in the Indo-Pacific region and should do more, ambassador to Japan says
- Sam Taylor
- Martin Scorsese, out with new film, explains what interested him in Osage murders: This is something more insidious
Ranking
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Case dropped against North Dakota mother in baby’s death
- Abreu, Alvarez and Altuve power Astros’ rout of Rangers in Game 4 to even ALCS
- We Can’t Keep These Pics of Taylor Swift, Selena Gomez and Zoë Kravitz’s Night Out to Ourselves
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- No gun, no car, no living witnesses against man charged in Tupac Shakur killing, defense lawyer says
- Maryland circuit court judge Andrew Wilkinson shot and killed outside home
- Rolling Stones and Lady Gaga give stunning performance at intimate album release show
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
'Old Dads': How to watch comedian Bill Burr's directorial debut available now
The 10 Best Sales to Shop This Weekend: Wayfair, Ulta, J.Crew Factory, Calpak, Kate Spade & More
Research by Public Health Experts Shows ‘Damning’ Evidence on the Harms of Fracking
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Making 'El Clásico' more classic: Barcelona to feature Rolling Stones logo on jersey
Research by Public Health Experts Shows ‘Damning’ Evidence on the Harms of Fracking
2 killed, 2 escape house fire in Reno; 1 firefighter hospitalized